The debt funding gap differs across markets for example, the Sydney CBD office
To further this analysis, CBRE looked at the funding gap for the entire Australian office sector in 2024, using investment volumes as a proxy for loan origination in 2021 (US$13 billion).
CBRE forecasts weighted capital values of office properties in Australia to fall by 19% between 2021 and 2024, and LTVs to change from 55% to 50% in the same period.
Two components are used to calculate the funding gap: 1) the change in capital values between the origination of the loan and the refinancing, and 2) the change in LTV ratio available at the time of origination and refinancing.
Assuming a changing LTV of 55% at origination, to 50% at refinance, and assuming that all office investment in Australia was leveraged and had a three-year loan maturity, this would create a debt-funding gap of US$1.91 billion. This would result in a 15% funding gap on the total investment volume, or a 33% funding gap on the original equity amount.
Figure 10: Funding gap example – Australia CBD office
Note: This analysis assumes that all investment in the market was levered at a 55% LTV in 2021, with the investment having a loan maturity of 3 year before refinance is needed.
Source: CBRE Research, Q1 2024
(Click to enlarge)
Some funding gap to arise, but volume will be minimal compared to Europe and the U.S.
With LTVs in Asia Pacific remaining mostly unchanged, much of the debt funding gap is a consequence of declining capital values. Office is the most exposed sector to the debt funding gap, with CBRE forecasting a gap of US$6.1 billion over the next three years. The funding gap will be largely concentrated in the office sector in Australia and mainland China, with a funding gap expected to occur in both 2024 and 2025. Although the relaxation of LTV rations has prevented a funding gap for offices in Hong Kong SAR, CBRE believes this asset class will continue to face challenges around refinancing discussions. Few offices have been transacted at significant discounts in so far in 2024.
The funding gap in Asia Pacific is minimal compared to the U.S. and Europe. According to CBRE EA, the funding gap for U.S. commercial real estate currently stands at US$157.3 billion, and for European commercial real estate at US$191.4 billion. As in Asia Pacific, much of this funding gap has been driven by significant capital value decline. However, LTV change has been the largest differentiator, with LTVs for commercial real estate in the U.S. dropping from 72% to 57%, and falling from ~65% to ~55% across Europe.
Figure 11: Funding gap – By market and sector (Asia Pacific, US$mn)
Source: CBRE Research Q1 2024
(Click to enlarge)
Capital value decline drives funding gap in Asia Pacific
Since the beginning of 2021, the Asia Pacific retail and industrial sectors have witnessed limited capital value declines. Expectations are for both sectors to experience modest capital value growth in 2024.
However, some office markets in the region, particularly Australia, mainland China and Hong Kong SAR, are expected to see some capital value decline in 2024.
Figure 12: Capital value index – Asia Pacific (2021 = 100)
Note: Weighted averages are used for Australia (Sydney, Brisbane & Melbourne) and mainland China (Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou) based on total stock in each market
Source: CBRE Research, Q1 2024
(Click to enlarge)
Available capital (dry powder) for commercial real estate investment still elevated, with limited fund raising so far in 2024
Opportunistic and value-add strategies are a focus for unallocated private equity real estate capital globally, with approximately 41% of all unallocated real estate capital worldwide targeting these strategies.
With limited distress in Asia Pacific, fund raising for debt strategies will remain limited in 2024, leaving investors to instead focus on traditional strategies such as value-add and core.
Figure 13: Asia Pacific private equity fundraising levels for commercial real estate – by strategy (US$bn)
Source: Preqin, CBRE Research May 2024
(Click to enlarge)
Figure 14: Asia Pacific private equity dry powder levels for commercial real estate – by strategy (US$bn)
Source: Preqin, CBRE Research May 2024
(Click to enlarge)